Search overlay

Search form

People

    Programs

      Events

        Faculty, Marketing

        Opinion: Retail COVID fears have lapsed, shoplifting fears have not

        January 25, 2023 By O.C. and Linda Ferrell

        All News

         

        retail store entry

        Some retail stores have closed due to shoplifting losses. Harbert College of Business marketing faculty O.C. and Linda Ferrell provide their perspective on the issue.

        Shoplifting is “spreading faster than COVID” according to Bob Nardelli, former Chrysler and Home Depot CEO. Shoplifting is at epidemic levels with skyrocketing retail losses of $94.5 billion in 2021 and more than $100 billion in 2022.

        The impact on earnings is decidedly noticed by companies like Target who are estimated to lose $600 million in 2022 to theft. Target stock was over $250/share, but the stock price now is around $163/share. Although some of the theft can be tied to a belief in entitlement, there is also significant involvement from organized crime. Retailers such as Kroger, Best Buy, CVS and Walgreens have voiced concerns over shoplifting. CVS has even closed some stores in locations where losses were too large to continue to operate. Walmart’s CEO indicates the situation is so dire that many stores may have to close if the situation does not dramatically improve.

        Shoplifters generally fit into one of two categories—individuals or organized crime. Many see an opportunity in shoplifting due to the low risk of being caught in many cities coupled with little or no punishment. In California, stealing merchandise worth $950 or less is a misdemeanor with authorities often not conducting investigations. It is estimated that only 1 in 150 shoplifters are caught. While the law imposes fines and jail time for first-time offenders, there is usually no prosecution. Organized groups have gone into CVS and Walgreens and emptied the shelves with no consequences.

        Why do people shoplift? There are many reasons and from an ethical perspective the level of opportunity to do so factors in with self-service stores providing an easy way to take advantage for personal gain. It is estimated that 7-10% of the population are ethical egoists who act in their own self-interest. Individuals will take advantage of a situation if the perceived risk of getting caught is low and potential benefits are seen as high. Another motivation can be tied to the drug epidemic in this country. Drug addiction and mental health challenges contribute to shoplifting. Some shoplift for the ‘high’ or excitement of taking a risk and obtaining products for status or to provide additional income. In addition, some people may see businesses as profitable and greedy so they don’t see any harm in taking advantage of the opportunity to steal and don’t perceive any harm will occur.

        An important question is, why has there been a dramatic increase in shoplifting? It’s possible that unemployment and economic uncertainty, in conjunction with the end of government stimulus payments, has contributed to shoplifting. It’s also possible that we are moving in the direction of an entitlement culture, where some people feel they have a right to something or deserve special treatment without personal commitment or sacrifice.

        How devastating is the impact of major shoplifting? Retailers, particularly large, publicly traded companies historically have been responsible for taking a stakeholder approach to operating their business. This means that they are concerned with not only their shareholders, but they are concerned with customers, employees, suppliers, communities, etc. The deluge of shoplifting has created critical waves of disruption impacting all major stakeholders. When a store closes, employees lose their jobs, customers no longer have access to the store, tax revenue that would go to the community is lost, suppliers lose business and shareholders are impacted, with a reduction in overall sales potential.

        The final question is: What is the solution to our current shoplifting epidemic? To start, let’s look at a company which has not had the problems of other major retailers. Costco has some unique characteristics that have helped protect it from shoplifting. First, to shop in a Costco, you must have a membership or be entering to apply for a membership. This means that several employees are at the front of the store to screen those coming in and to check carts and receipts of those leaving. In talking with Jason Arends at Alliance Bernstein L.P., he noted that Costco offers bulk items which would be difficult to dislodge and take in a ‘grab and go’ scenario.  Costco also employs some tactics that are used for shoplifting prevention: create a layout that places more vulnerable items further back in the store and places more expensive items in controlled or locked cases; have security cameras, mirrors and signage that deters shoplifting; train employees to protect themselves and to be able to identify suspicious behavior.

        The stakes are high if we cannot come up with an effective solution to this current epidemic. Employees and customers do not want to be at risk in these situations. It’s already difficult enough to recruit employees in today’s environment. Store responses have been to limit hours and close some locations. The solution will take a consortium of concerned individuals, including law enforcement officials, retail associations such as The National Retail Federation, and large national retailers who are willing to step up and champion some of the best practices and new thinking on how to deal with this challenge. Also, there needs to be more academic research to determine why individuals shoplift and how retailers can protect their stores against shoplifting while maintaining a safe environment for all key stakeholders. Maybe some stores in some of the highest risk locations will need to rethink their business model and offer virtual stores through apps and AI with pickup at store locations. There is so much at stake, now is the time to rethink some fundamentals of brick-and-mortar retailing.

        Linda Ferrell is the Globe Life Professor of Marketing at Auburn University's Harbert College of Business. She also serves as an expert in ethics and legal disputes. She is former president of the Academy of Marketing Science.

        O.C. Ferrell is the James T. Pursell, Sr. Eminent Scholar in Ethics at Auburn University’s Harbert College of Business. In addition to his teaching, research and textbooks, Ferrell is director of the Center for Ethical Organizational Cultures. Ferrell has served as an expert witness is some high-profile ethics, legal, and marketing cases. He is former president of the Academy of Marketing Science.